Support Grist
Support nonprofit, independent environmental journalism.
Donate to Grist.

In the News

Tools: print | email | write to the editor | subscribe | RSS

For Specious Skies

EPA plans to loosen air-quality rules near national parks

Posted at 11:45 AM on 16 May 2008

Call us crazy, but rewriting the Clean Air Act to ease the way for new coal plants near national parks seems to fly in the face of that whole "clean air" thing. But sure enough, the U.S. EPA plans to make a change allowing the government to calculate the average annual emissions of power plants near parks and wilderness areas, instead of tracking (and potentially punishing) the spikes in pollution spewed during peak energy times. "It's like if you're pulled over by a cop for going 75 miles per hour in a 55 miles-per-hour zone, and you say, 'If you look at how I've driven all year, I've averaged 55 miles per hour,'" explains Mark Wenzler of the National Parks Conservation Association. The NPCA estimates that the rule change will ease construction of 28 new coal plants within 186 miles of 10 national parks. And those parks are hazy enough as it is, laments one National Park Service engineer: "It would really be a setback in trying to make progress."

sources:  The Washington Post, Reuters
straight to the NPCA report:  Dark Horizons
see also, in Grist:  An interview with Tom Kiernan of the National Parks Conservation Association

< Previous | Next >


Comments: (3 comments)

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have a Gristmill account, log in below. If you don't have a Gristmill account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.

Username: Password:

Forgot your password? Enter your username and click:

putting the smoke back in the Smokies

This doesn't bode well for the Smoky Mtn National Park....just downwind from the hazardous / nuclear waste incinerator at Oak Ridge and all the many coal plants whose emissions funnel down through the southern foothills of the Appalachians

Or Well, there goes the neighborhood!

Does anyone else feel like they are trapped in 1984? Where the governmental department of Environmental Protection is in charge of destroying our environment?

I mean, I could possibly understand if the EPA had some other mandate to consider in addition to protecting the environment, but that is it's name!

Gotta fight 'em one-by-one...

...if they wanna make it easier for the coal plants, then we just haveta fight the proposed plants off one by one.

Not an easy feat, but we aren't just gonna lay over and let 'em win like this.

The comments of Grist users reflect the opinions of those individuals only, and do not necessarily reflect the viewpoints of Grist, its staff, its board members, their psychotherapists, or their aestheticians. Got it?


ADVERTISING POLICY


About Grist | Support Grist | Jobs Board | Archives | Grist by Email | RSS | Podcasts
Gristmill Blog | In the News | Ask Umbra® | Muckraker | Victual Reality | 'Tis the Season | The Grist List | The Bottom Line



Grist: Environmental News and Commentary
a beacon in the smog (tm) ©2007. Grist Magazine, Inc. All rights reserved. Gloom and doom with a sense of humor®.
Webmaster | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Trademarks